Signed in as:
... in the quest for validation, regarding non-existent scandals - targeting unindictable Individuals!
You'll see what I mean; for-instance, directly-below: here's an article from 2005.
Now, you know how nowadays, in "the current-year," anything said about Islam which isn't completely-sycophantic will be lambasted by the press as "Islamophobic?" (think Trump-campaign, 2016)
Well, you'll NEVER believe this - back in 2005 (when I was first coming-up, in "The Movement..."), there was a rumor going-around that some "Unholy-Alliance" existed - not between the left, and Islam (as exists, today) - but between "White-Supremacists," and The TALIBAN!!!
So, let me get this straight; depending on whatever the current-year happens to be, regardless of whether you have anything good OR unflattering to say about a particular group of (mostly) nonwhite-peoples, makes you [effectively] a fucking nazi... Is that starting to sound familiar?
The only REAL variable, is: whether or not you are White; everything-else is, well, IRRELEVANT!
So yeah - 15-years ago, if you were down with the Clown (Muhammad, that-is), then according to this Jewish author from "The Weekly-Standard" (Yeah, Daveed Gartenstein-Ross KIND-of gives it away, if you know what I mean..), YOU, my friend, COULD BE AN ANTI-SEMITE!
Oi. Fucking. VEH... (Moustache links-Directly...)
(What they won't tell you is that Arabs are Semitic-people, too.)
BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? IT'S REALLY NOT THAT FUNNY; EVEN IN THE ARTICLE ITSELF, THE AUTHOR IS LYING RIGHT TO YOUR FACE. I MEAN, ASK YOURSELF THIS QUESTION: AS A CHILD, GROWING-UP, PEOPLE COULD PRETTY-MUCH SAY ANYTHING ABOUT "THE NAZIS," AND YOU'D BELIEVE IT, RIGHT? MEANWHILE, YOU'VE GOT PEOPLE RUNNING-AROUND WITH A PICTURE OF THE MASSMURDER "Che Guevara," BECAUSE THEY THINK HE'S THE LEAD-FUCKING SINGER FOR "RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE..."
SO, HERE'S THE LIE: IN THIS ARTICLE, OUR PAL GARTENSTEIN-ROSS MAKES THE FOLLOWING-CLAIM: "Such an alliance seems unlikely on its face; after all, neo-Nazis view most Muslims as racially inferior..." (Opening, paragraph-II)
FIRST of all - it's impossible for a RELIGION, to be "racially-inferior" to anybody! Islam is a religion - not a "person of color..."
JUST-BECAUSE iSLAM is mostly practiced by "persons of color," does not bring it any closer, to constituting a race; already, we are seeing the beginnings of that conflation of the two-ideas, which has become so ubiquitous today, as to warrant this entire dissection of the Article.
SECONDLY: for our Jewish author to assume the two are interchangeable, just because of that Arabic-correlation mentioned above, actually makes HIM the racist, here; what a surprise: Arabs and Jews at eachother's throats, already...
HE STATES THIS, AS IF IT IS A KNOWN-FACT; BECAUSE HEY! WHAT BETTER-AUTHORITY ON ALL THINGS NAZI, THAN THE (PURPORTED) MORTAL-ENEMIES OF THE NAZIS, THEMSELVES; RIGHT?
(don't get all anti-semitic on me now, bucko; we're almost to the promised-land, here!)
WELL, HERE'S THE PROBLEM WITH THAT: HITLER HIMSELF SENT DELEGATES TO THE ARAB-WORLD, AND EVEN MADE THE STATEMENT THAT:
(with regard to Islam) "due to our shared militaristic nature, we have more in-common with the Muhmmadens than, say, the French."
DOES THAT SOUND LIKE SOMEBODY WHO CONSIDERS ISLAMIC-PEOPLES TO BE "RACIALLY-INFERIOR," MR. JEWISH-AUTHOR? I don't think so.
Where this comment came from, is actually taken out-of-context. Here is a LINK to the article, so you can read it for yourself; but "racially-inferior" appears to be a relative-term, which - having to do with the climate of Europe, as compared to say Egypt - was mentioned in an offhand-way, as Hitler out-loud was imagining to his close friend and confidant, Albert Speer (the Architect-character) how the Arabs might have fared, had they won the Eighth-century Battle of Tours (like, in France); and, during the course of this conversation, ruminated with-regard to their desert-adapted features.
"INFERIORITY," in this context, had everything to do with adaptation to climate, and nothing to do with a personal disdain/hatred/ISLAMOPHOBIA...
ARE "NEO-NAZIS" ISLAMO-PHOBIC, OR ISLAMO-PHILIAC???
Because our PAST TWO PRESIDENTS sure seemed to fall-into the latter-category; as did HITLER:
Yeah - I know; double-take territory, for-sure!
ANYWAY: This is but one, of the many, many, many claims made by supposed "mainstream" news-outlets, regarding the Führer; and I think we can establish (if you've done your homework, also) that: this man apparently admired Islam, immensely.
SO: WE CAN, CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINE, THAT SIMPLY "DISAGREEING" WITH ISLAM DOESN'T MAKE YOU A "NEO-NAZI;" QUITE THE OPPOSITE.
Go-ahead, test my conclusion! Visit any self-proclaimed "National-Socialist," or "Aryan" discussion-board/article/website, and you will see nothing but Islamic-apologetics, up the Wazoo!!
IF-ANYTHING, IT APPEARS TO BE THE "ANTI-FASCISTS" (read: Classical-Liberals) who're most-opposed to the militant, patriarchal, fanatical and Violent precepts of iSlam; which the remainder of our content, shall demonstrate Satisfactorily.
... is now a violation of civil-rights? Dave Cullen Explains:
TWO THINGS to remember, while watching this:
STALIN famously stated:
"The death of one is a tragedy - the death of millions, merely a Statistic" (He would know...)
STALIN was also a BIG fan, of airbrushing his former-"comrades" out of public photos - this is where George Orwell came-up with the idea of the "memory-hole," in all-likelihood (1984).
Perhaps, revising-History, is how Karl Marx actually planned to achieve "... The End of History" (The Communist-Manifesto).
Relation? Wild Smile, explains:
To pass us off as "racist." This is never going to end - fending-off racist accusations is not our full-time job; and it's certainly nothing any self-respecting White-identifying person (of ALL Colors) would VOLUNTEER to do!! Hell - if I'm gonna volunteer for anything? It's going to be to ENSURE THAT: IF THIS NATION CONTINUES TO HEAD-DOWN THE PATH OF "SOCIALISM," WE'LL MAKE DAMN-SURE IT'S NATIONAL-SOCIALISM. So just STOP! They've created a monster: now it's time for us to devour our creator:
... a culture of "victimhood," has a tendency to exaggerate its achievements, as well as its plight; which is why (and how), such a culture will always find a way to Ultimately Victimize-Itself.
If THIS is the best they've got, then this is going to be a lot easier, than we thought!
... BRING. It. LOSERS!