Let Josephine Explain:
(Oh, and that comment Josephine made about the "dreadlocks?.." It just so-happens to appear in the video below, which I actually included on this page before Josephine's monologue. So, there appears to be some feng-shui going on with this website, already! Perhaps, just perhaps, it has something to do with our Symbolism. Please, read-on)
There is a great misconception, which you must get-out of your head immediately, that the mere conception of racial-awareness – group-identity – and ancestral-pride, somehow automatically coincides with a right-wing ideology. Nothing could be further from the truth!
NOBODY ever says this to, for instance, the Japanese. Did you ever hear anybody accuse Japan of being “too Japanese?” Or, say South Korea, for being “Too Korean?”
No, of-course not!! This phenomenon – of being associated with “racism,” simply for exercising racial in-group preference – is exclusive to whites. There’s actually a name for it, as a matter of fact! Do you know what it is? It’s called: “Ethno-masochism.” That’s right; an inculcated-catharsis associated with despising/debasing/degrading oneself, based upon ethnicity.
This is a phenomenon exclusive to Anglo-Saxon/Caucasian peoples (though #notall of us practice it, obviously), and from all available evidence, it’s not a spontaneous one. Rather, like the collective German guilt still felt after World War II (and preceding that, World War I - which ultimately led to World War II - but we'll discuss that later), this phenomenon has been carefully-orchestrated to selectively-impact only one group of people: US.
Now, why would anybody in their right-mind wish to see such a gruesome, self-hating philosophy foisted-upon us? Afterall, if White Civilization in its aggregate historically represents Liberal Democracies, Free-Market Enterprise, Individualism, Property-rights, Personal Expression, Self-determination, Freedom of Speech, and The Free Practice of Religion therein (not that this website advocates a religious-affiliation, in any way) – then why do so many supposed practitioners of “tolerance” wish to see the very foundations of their beloved
It doesn’t make much sense, until you understand that from the get-go, the very term “Liberalism” itself even had to be hijacked by the earliest Marxist/Communist thinkers – in order to confuse us into associating those principles of classical-Liberalism described above, with communist theory. And if you think for even a moment that communism advocates for these principles, then think again. Here is a direct-quote from Lenin, one of Marx’s protégés, regarding the necessity of a “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” - or “exploited working-class” – in his work, “The State and Revolution” (1917):
“The dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e. the organization of the vanguard of the oppressed as the ruling class for the purpose of suppressing the oppressors, cannot result merely in an expansion of democracy. Simultaneously, with an immense expansion of democracy, which, for the first time, becomes democracy for the poor, democracy for the people, and not democracy for the money-bags, the dictatorship of the proletariat imposes a series of restrictions on the freedom of the oppressors, the exploiters, the capitalists. We must suppress them in order to free humanity from wage slavery, their resistance must be crushed by force; it is clear that there is no freedom and no democracy where there is suppression and where there is violence.”
Hmm.. So, we must suppress to end suppression, and forcefully “crush” to end violence. Oh, and while we're at it? Let's make sure we go-ahead and start imposing some "restrictions on the freedom of 'those oppressors;'" i.e., in today's zeitgeist, WHITE-People.
Starting to sound familiar, yet?